www.mozilla.com Weather Central
Voices
Headlines

Hutch CC's Jamie Patrick picks Colorado State -4/15/2014, 12:43 PM

USD 308 criticizes school finance bill -4/15/2014, 11:40 AM

Two vehicles, pedestrian involved in accident -4/15/2014, 11:40 AM

Sanctuary dedication latest milestone in Chapel Hill's growth -4/15/2014, 11:40 AM

Jobs, water source remain top priorities, Wichitans say -4/15/2014, 11:40 AM

Edwards County accident blamed on slick roads -4/15/2014, 11:40 AM

Kansas Honor Flight to leave for Washington -4/14/2014, 3:42 PM

Hutchinson hospital names new vice president -4/14/2014, 3:42 PM

Experts offer advice for Wichita gardeners before tonight's freeze -4/14/2014, 3:42 PM

China grants approval for Cessna's Citation XLS+ -4/14/2014, 3:41 PM

Wichita weather: Snow returns in mid-April -4/14/2014, 3:40 PM

Work on Waldron near hospital, clinic begins Monday -4/14/2014, 3:40 PM

myTown Calendar

SPOTLIGHT
[var top_story_head]

New judge sought in Topeka sperm donor case

Published on -5/20/2013, 3:12 PM

Printer-friendly version
E-Mail This Story

TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) -- A Topeka man being sued by the state for child support after donating his sperm to a couple is requesting a new judge in the case.

William Marotta's attorney filed a motion Friday calling for Judge Mary E. Mattivi to disqualify herself from the case. The filing doesn't include a reason, and state law doesn't require Marotta to give one, The Topeka Capital-Journal reported (http://bit.ly/19VUFvK).

But if the judge declines to recuse herself, Marotta could file an affidavit spelling out the reason for his request. Possible reasons for filing an affidavit include concerns that the judge is related to either party or otherwise interested in the action or has a personal bias or prejudice in the case. Such an affidavit would be reviewed by a chief justice or other district judge.

Marotta answered an online ad for a sperm donation in 2009, for Angela Bauer and her then-partner, Jennifer Schreiner. The three signed an agreement that they believed severed Marotta's parental rights, and Schreiner became pregnant. But issues arose when the women split up and Schreiner sought state health insurance for the child.

Because no doctor was involved in the artificial insemination, the state sought to hold Marotta financially responsible. Under Kansas law, a physician must be involved in the artificial insemination for a man to be considered a donor.

digg delicious facebook stumbleupon google Newsvine
More News and Photos

Associated Press Videos